Kirk built a strong presence as both a radio host and podcaster, repeatedly voicing opposition to liberal stances on gun control, climate change, the civil rights movement, and 2SLGBTQ+ rights.
Among the rest, he was a vocal Israel supporter, with the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu calling Kirk a “lion-hearted friend of Israel” following his assessination.
“[Kirk] fought the lies and stood tall for Judeo-Christian civilization,” Netanyahu said. “His boundless pride in America and his valiant belief in free speech will leave a lasting impact.”
In a July 28 video he posted on X, Kirk said, “No, Israel is not starving Gazans.” This came at a time when humanitarian agencies were urging steps to ease hunger and stave off famine in Gaza.
However, another video of him shows him discussing the October 7 killing when Hamas launched a surprise assault across the Gaza–Israel border, targeting civilian communities, military outposts, and public gatherings.
“I think some questions need to be asked. Was there a stand down order?” Kirk asked.
“Six hours, I don’t believe it. Israel is the size of New Jersey. When I took a helicopter ride fro Jerusalem to the Gaza border, it’s 45 minutes.
“Six hours. They are livestreaming the ki*ling of Jews. Did somebody in the government say stand down?
“That is a legitimate non-conspiracy question,” Kirk ended.
In yet another video from August 7, Kirk told Megyn Kelly that his moral character was put into question and he was called anti-Semitic following a debate he had moderated at the Student Action Summit (SAS) 2025 with comedian and libertarian commentator Dave Smith and political commentator Josh Hammer.
The discussion focused largely on Israel and U.S. foreign policy, touching on issues such as neoconservatism, the influence of lobbying, and America’s involvement in international conflicts.
Dave Smith criticized what he sees as overreach by U.S. military interventions and the strong influence of neoconservatives on foreign policy. Drawing on figures like Ron Paul, Smith advocated for a more non-interventionist, constitutional approach rooted in the “founding-fathers” vision.
In contrast, Josh Hammer defended the traditional U.S.–Israel alliance and challenged Smith’s framing of the issues. The debate grew heated at times, reflecting deeper tensions over war, morality, political influence, and alignment with Israel.
The full discussion was later described as “The Debate Heard Around the World,” highlighting the importance of open dialogue and the airing of disagreements rather than the silencing of dissenting voices.
Days following the debate, Kirk issued a warning that strong forces were “after him,” according to powerprofilesraw.
People were quick to share their opinion on what really happened to Kirk and who is responsible for his life being cut short.
“Charlie Kirk got assassinated for the same reason JFK got assassinated,” one person commented. “This is only 2-3 weeks ago. He started going against Israel,” another added.
“This was a professional hit, we all know who did this… the same folks who took out the twin towers 24 years ago on this DAY!” a third commented. “He started to change his stance and with a platform as big as his they just couldn’t allow that,” someone else concluded.
Another person asked, “So he opposed the Israeli community?”
The killing of Charlie Kirk raises a lot of questions and conspiracy theories.
Many believe his assassination wasn’t an act of some lefty with a gun, but a military one.
Some even see it as a warning, stating, “If they can kill the face of the resistance, they hope the body will shut down.”
In a video posted on Instagram, lauraegocheaga claims, “When too much truth leaks out, Babylon hits the kill switch,” adding, “Charlie was the warning, you are the response.”
What is your opinion on this? Do you believe Charlie Kirk’s killing was a result of him asking the wrong question and messing with the wrong people?
Please SHARE this article with your family and friends on Facebook.
Bored Daddy
Love and Peace
